<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Career Pointers</title>
    <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>echamer@hamer-associates.ca</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-10-12T16:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>How Internal PR May Save Your Job</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/whats_not_in_your_employment_contract/</link>
      <description>When working with career transition clients - line managers, project managers, team leads, even senior management - one topic inevitably comes up in the first few weeks: why did you get laid off? The emphasis here is on you. After all, unless the company went entirely out of business, or the entire department was shut down, other employees were kept on, so what did you do (or not do) to find yourself out of a job? And to be sure, plummeting market conditions may well have been the trigger to spark a round of lay-offs&amp;#8230; But why you? It&amp;#8217;s not a superfluous question at all, nor is it designed to allow the client to wallow in self-pity for a few extra weeks ... No, to be clear, my intent is not to lay blame, or to make my client feel horrible.


The point I try to make: did anyone in charge know exactly what you were doing, and how much value you brought to the company? And if the answer is &amp;#8220;No&amp;#8221;, then my next question is: why not?</description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies, Negotiating Worth, Book Reviews</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, this is something nobody tells you outright. It&#8217;s not in the small print of your employment letter. It&#8217;s not covered in the employee orientation program. And yet it is entirely your responsibility to make sure that <u>the people with hiring and firing power</u> are aware of your contributions. There&#8217;s a commonly held belief that &#8220;if I do my job well, my boss will notice&#8221;; well, it&#8217;s not true. Your boss doesn&#8217;t have time to notice what you do well. In fact, in line with the 80-20 rule, your boss spends 80% of her time on the 20% of your co-workers who are <b>under</b>-performing. You are simply not even on her radar. 
</p>
<p>
So how do you make sure, that when the managers all sit around a table and discuss who should be let go to meet the corporate goal of &#8220;10% cost reduction&#8221;, your name is most likely to be stricken <i><b>off </b></i>the list of candidates? It&#8217;s really very simple, as Dilbert would say &#8220;If you&#8217;re indispensable, they can&#8217;t fire (or promote) you&#8221;. 
</p>
<p>
You must step up your efforts to execute a <b>smart Internal PR </b>campaign. You must learn how to educate your boss - and her boss - about all the wonderful, clever, cost-saving, money-making, collaborative, innovative things you do on a daily basis. 
</p>
<p>
For instance: Each time you do something &#8220;out of the ordinary&#8221; for a co-worker, send them an email thanking them for the opportunity to help out. When the inevitable reply comes thanking you for the help - forward that one to your boss. When you&#8217;ve stepped in to turn a tricky or delicate situation with a customer around - whip off an FYI email to your boss, and copy the customer service manager on it (unless they&#8217;re the same person) to let them know that you handled the crisis, and saved the day.
</p>
<p>
Don&#8217;t overdo it, and don&#8217;t do it for the &#8220;normal, every-day&#8221; stuff you&#8217;re paid to do. Occasionally&#8212;say once a month&#8212;write a memo about the extra tasks you completed, and, if possible, calculate how much money you saved (or earned) for the company. The better you can demonstrate your value on a regular basis, the less likely the company will be to sacrifice you to the &#8220;cost reduction demon&#8221;. 
</p>
<p>
Recommended Reading: <i>"<a href="http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/books/Brag-Art-Tooting-Your-Own-Peggy-Klaus/9780446692786-item.html?ref=Search+Books%3a+%2527Brag!%2527" title="BRAG">BRAG</a>! The Art of Tooting Your Horn Without Blowing It"</i>, by Peggy Klaus (ISBN 10:0446692786). Peggy debunks all the myths that keep you from letting people know how well you&#8217;re doing. She says: &#8220;To brag is to talk about your best self with pride and passion in a conversational manner.&#8221; And make no mistake: It&#8217;s part of your job to let your boss(es) know what a <b>GREAT </b>job you&#8217;re doing. And when your name does come up, the reaction around the table will be: &#8220;Heck no, we can&#8217;t let [Mike] or [Jane] go! The place would fall apart in days! Pick someone else!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-10-12T16:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Be specific, be very specific</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/be_specific_be_very_specific/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, as we&#8217;re working on Career Objectives, one of my clients will get all squirmy and anxious, because they&#8217;re afraid their objective isn&#8217;t broad enough. Worried that they might miss out on an opportunity, because the objective is too narrow, or too specific. 
<br />
Bollocks! I say; there is no such thing as <i>too</i> specific. In fact, the more specific your objective is, the better.
</p>
<p>
Imagine the following scenario: one morning, you walk into your local super market, and stand there for a few minutes, looking lost. Sure enough, somebody will approach you, and ask how they can help you. &#8220;I&#8217;m here to buy some food&#8221; you say. The store clerk smiles nervously, and is bound to ask you &#8220;What kind of food, madam?&#8221; With a determined look on your face, you answer: &#8220;Lunch. I&#8217;m here to buy lunch food.&#8221; No matter how determined you are, you&#8217;re not helping the clerk help you. &#8220;What kind of lunch food, madam? Hot or cold? Sandwich or salad? Meat or vegetarian? Packaged? Frozen? Ready-made? Fresh??&#8221; 
</p>
<p>
You get the picture. My point is: the more specific you are, the easier it is to walk you to the correct aisle in the super market. Likewise, the easier it is to put you in touch with the right kind of people, who can help you with information and advice relevant to your objective. If this means, that you have 4, 5, or even 10 different resumes, each with a different - but specific - objective, then so be it.
</p>
<p>
As Dr. Phil says: &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to name it, before you can claim it&#8221;. If you don&#8217;t know exactly what you want, and say exactly what you want, nobody will be able to help you, let alone give you what you want.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T22:39:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>That&apos;s right: 6 out of every 10 jobs were never advertised ... so how do people find them?</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/6_out_of_every_10_jobs_were_never_advertised/</link>
      <description>By now, most people know that &amp;#8220;networking&amp;#8221; is the way to get a mid-level to senior job these days. In fact, almost 60% of respondents to a large scale survey quoted &amp;#8220;through contacts&amp;#8221; as the way they&amp;#8217;d landed their job&amp;#8212;through business contacts, through family members, tipped by a friend or schoolmate, or recruited by someone who already worked there&amp;#8212;in short, through a process of referrals.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Career Strategies</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Granovetter, of Stanford University, revisited his original 1970&#8217;s research and theories on the power of our casual networks of friends and acquaintances in his 1982 essay &#8220;The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited&#8221; and found that still 56% of respondents (technical, professional and managerial careers) cited &#8220;through contacts&#8221; ... almost 6 in every 10 jobs had not been advertised, and were found through a network of &#8220;weak&#8221; contacts.
</p>
<p>
See: <a href="http://www.analytictech.com/networks/weakties.htm" target="_blank" >http://www.analytictech.com/networks/weakties.htm</a>
</p>
<p>
Weak ties&#8212;as opposed to the strong and intimate ties we have to family, spouse, close and dear friends&#8212;have proven to be much more effective in exploring the world of job opportunities, precisely because people we don&#8217;t know intimately often move in greatly different circles&#8212;social and business&#8212;than we do ourselves.
</p>
<p>
<img src="/images/6outOf10.gif" />
<br />
 
<br />
<em>In the illustration, you&#8217;ll see a number of partially overlapping ovals - these represent groups of people. You are at the centre of these groups, or networks of people.
</p>
<p>
The further away from you, and the more tenuous the connection, the higher the chance that a contact will have information you don&#8217;t have, and will know people you don&#8217;t.
</p>
<p>
Networking is this simple ... You know Ann, one of your office pals, and Ann knows Sue and Jim. What if Jim happens to be working in an industry you&#8217;re interested in? Well, if you go and talk to Jim, on Ann&#8217;s say-so, Jim might think highly enough of what you have to offer, to refer you to his boss&#8212;who might be interested in hiring you.</em>
</p>
<p>
See also: SPM Group&#8217;s White Paper on The Strengths of Weak Ties
</p>
<p>
<em>Source: Granovetter, M. (1982). 
<br />
The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. 
<br />
In Marsden, P.V. and Lin, N., editors, Social Structure and Network Analysis, pages 105--130. Beverly Hills: Sage.</em>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-11-12T23:20:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Top 10 Reasons Why Resumes Suck</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/top_10_reasons_why_resumes_suck/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies, Resume Development</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stand out from the crowd. That&#8217;s what a good resume will help you do. Unfortunately, most resumes suck at this. Maybe, if you&#8217;re honest with yourself, it&#8217;s time for a no-holds-barred, critical review of your current resume. Especially if one or more of the following <b>Top 10 Reasons</b> applies:
</p>
<p>
1. <b>The resume has no objective.</b> If you can&#8217;t articulate what it is you&#8217;re looking for, specifically, you&#8217;re leaving it up to the junior HR clerk, who gets stuck with the screening process, to decide for you.
<br />
2. <b>If there is an objective, it&#8217;s usually a self-serving one</b> (I&#8217;m looking for a great job, with fabulous benefits, interesting challenges, and opportunities for rapid advancement). Who cares what you want?
<br />
3. <b>It&#8217;s all about what you&#8217;ve done for other companies.</b> Frankly - no-one gives a hoot about that; they want to know &#8216;What Can You Do For Me?&#8217;
<br />
4. <b>TMI - Too Much Information. </b>Contrary to popular belief, it is not good practice to list everything and the kitchen sink. You&#8217;re just providing ammunition to the screener to say &#8216;yeah, well, we don&#8217;t need that&#8217;
<br />
5. <b>NEI - Not Enough Information. </b>Not about what you&#8217;ve done before (see #3) but about <b>Who You Are</b>. Generic resumes are also utterly boring, and completely devoid of any personality.
<br />
6. <b>Orphaned Achievements:</b> If the resumes even list achievements, they do so without specifying your actual role and contribution, how they were achieved, or what the results were.
<br />
7. <b>Confuse &#8216;skills&#8217; with &#8216;tools&#8217;.</b> Skills are things you can do (for them); tools are things you use to get results. And telling people you can use The Internet, and Word and Excel, these days, is like telling people you know how to use a rotary dial phone ... 
<br />
8. <b>Excessive Use of Buzz-Words.</b> &#8216;dynamic leader&#8217;, &#8216;people person&#8217;, &#8216;problem-solver&#8217;, &#8216;results-oriented&#8217;, &#8216;self-starter&#8217; --- C&#8217;mon people! Let&#8217;s try and be a bit more original here; surely you can come up with better words to present yourself? Define your strengths, and articulate them creatively - that should get you noticed.
<br />
9. <b>Contain the phrase &#8216;References are available on request&#8217;</b>. Well, duh. That&#8217;s kind of like kicking in an open door, isn&#8217;t it? Leave it off; it&#8217;s understood.
<br />
10. <b>List hobbies, personal interests, and volunteer activities indiscriminately.</b> Don&#8217;t include any of these, unless there is a direct connection to the job you&#8217;re applying for; if you&#8217;re applying as Executive Director of a non-profit foundation, then, by all means, let them know that you have successfully raised thousands of dollars for your kid&#8217;s soccer team. Otherwise - skip it.
</p>
<p>
This list could probably be expanded - up to 20, or 30 reasons ... but I think I&#8217;ve made my point.&nbsp; If you want to do something about your resume, and increase your chances of getting the job you want - contact me. It doesn&#8217;t matter where in the world you are; I have worked as a career consultant in Europe and North America - and a good resume is a good resume, regardless of where you are. What&#8217;s to lose?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-30T17:02:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Don&apos;t want to be a manager? Good! Management doesn&apos;t think you can be, anyway</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/dont_want_to_be_a_manager/</link>
      <description>Today I left a comment on one of J.T. O&amp;#8217;Donnell&amp;#8216;s posts, on her site Careerealism. The article was about why most managers don&amp;#8217;t think any of their staff  would qualify to be a manager themselves, so it&amp;#8217;s just as well that a large majority of employees indicated in a survey that they don&amp;#8217;t want to move into management. 


As one of the reasons staff have such a jaded and unkind view of management, J.T. cites what she calls &amp;#8220;The Office Effect&amp;#8221;. The way the manager of the fictitious paper products company is portrayed in the TV series &amp;#8220;The Office&quot; conforms to the widely-held notion among office workers everywhere: managers are clueless, petty, uninspiring, pompous idiots, who have &amp;#8220;risen to the top through lack of (intellectual) weight.&amp;#8221;. According to a recent survey by Adecco, more than 1 in 4 employees consider their managers to be &amp;#8220;completely incompetent&amp;#8221;. And in another survey, fully 69% of respondents indicated that they would not want their manager&amp;#8217;s job. J.T.&amp;#8217;s articles are always a great read; you can find this article here. Continue to read my comments on the post ...</description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><img src="http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/the-office-michael-scott.jpg" /></blockquote>
<p>
Reading J.T.&#8217;s post reminded me of the 1937 quote from Eleanor Roosevelt: <i>"No one can make you feel inferior without your consent."</i> What this means in the workplace, in my opinion, is that you always have a choice as to how you are perceived. You can decide how to respond to negative stereotypes, how to behave when people disrespect you, and how to change the minds of corporate skeptics. This is true for management and employees alike; and doing nothing to correct the wrong impressions is a decision, too.
</p>
<p>
The often-mentioned &#8220;sense of entitlement&#8221; is one of the main &#8220;beefs&#8221; my executive coaching clients bring up when they talk about their staff&#8217;s attitudes. While this may be in part a generational thing, it is common knowledge that &#8220;a sense of entitlement&#8221; is the source of a lot of whining in the workplace. &#8220;I put in my time, now I should get the promotion&#8221; or &#8220;How come so-and-so got into that choice project, instead of me? Management screwed up again&#8221;.
</p>
<p>
The North American workplace, by and large, is a meritocracy. If you do your job well, exceed expectations, are pleasant to be around, have a positive work ethic, and can be relied upon to help your co-workers, chances are that your efforts will be recognized. You can accelerate that process by conducting a strategic Internal PR campaign, but it starts with your attitude. Nobody &#8220;owes&#8221; you anything, not even a job. So if you want to keep the job, start thinking about what you&#8217;re doing to earn it. I wrote a post about this not so long ago, and just recently updated it:<a href="http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/career_pointers/whats_not_in_your_employment_contract/" title=" click here to read it."> click here to read it.</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-05-19T21:34:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Do you know how much you&apos;re worth?</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/do_you_know_how_much_youre_worth/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies, Interview Strategies, Negotiating Worth</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the much-ballyhooed &#8220;recession&#8221; set in, talk of a labour shortage has gone quiet. <b>Paradoxically, though, there is a real shortage</b>, but it is not a &#8220;Quantity Problem&#8221;. It is, my friends, a &#8220;Quality Problem&#8221;; as per the saying &#8220;Good Help is Hard to Find&#8221;. And getting harder; see <a href="http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/archivespointersperformance/finding_the_cherries_how_to_hire_in_a_high_supply_market/" title="my recent post">my recent post</a> on the down-side of an increase in the numbers of people looking for work. That isn&#8217;t making it easier for companies to find the right people at all.
</p>
<p>
So, having said that it&#8217;s a quality issue more than anything else, people with strong soft skills and competencies in wide array of disciplines are going to be very much in high demand. In knowledge and information intensive industries, such as software development, the shortage is projected to become critical within the next year. Good news for job switchers and seekers - in a world of scarcity, prices tend to go up, after all. The general expectation is that for mid-level and senior specialists and (project) managers, market rates may go up as much as 15 - 25% over the next 18 months or so.
</p>
<p>
So how do you know whether you&#8217;re being paid well, or being under-paid, or whether an offer for a new job accurately reflects your market value? Well - do you know what value you bring to the organization? Can you articulate the tangible and intangible impact you have had - or will have, based on your track record - and can you translate that into real $$?
</p>
<p>
Don&#8217;t worry - most people can&#8217;t, either. But if you are ever going to be successful negotiating real market value for yourself, you&#8217;d better start learning where you bring value to the company - and how much that value is. And you need to start documenting your successes now - well in advance of a performance review, or the final interview of a job application.
</p>
<p>
It may seem a daunting task, and one that you probably think only the people working in sales are able to do. After all, they can point to the number of sales per quarter, the average revenue per sale, the reduction of cost to close the sale, the average margin per sale, etc. But what about someone in customer service? Or someone in the A/R department? Or someone writing marketing copy? How do you measure the value in that?
</p>
<p>
When you think about it, a company only hires people to do things that are worth doing (although we probably at some time have all worked in jobs that didn&#8217;t feel like that). Worth doing to a company means &#8216;saves them money, or makes them money&#8217;. Start by focusing on all the ways in which your work contributes to one or both of those goals. Compare before and after situations - what has changed as a result of your efforts? And has that change resulted in a cost savings or in a revenue increase? Or has it contributed to a better customer experience? Equally important and valuable, since happy customers tend to generate higher sales, both their own, and from the people they recommend your company to. Better customer service both saves money (you figure out how much) and earns more revenue (you find out how much). If you can&#8217;t lay your hands on exact figures - guesstimate. But be realistic; this is no time for exaggeration. That only backfires, as you probably know already.
</p>
<p>
If you can articulate your value, and can provide documented proof of the monetary value of your efforts, entering into a salary negotiation becomes a much less one-sided conversation, and will help you resist &#8216;taking the job, because they&#8217;ve offered it&#8217;. And it will help you understand where your true value lies - and companies will understand it, too.
</p>
<p>
Good luck in 2009/10. And if you&#8217;d like some strategy help and advice - you know where to find me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-23T23:08:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Getting noticed is now 5 times harder</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/getting_noticed_is_now_5_times_harder/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies, Interview Strategies</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend alerted me to a blogpost by <a href="http://summation.typepad.com/about.html" title="Auren Hoffman">Auren Hoffman</a>, CEO of <a href="http://business.rapleaf.com/" title="Rapleaf">Rapleaf</a>, about <a href="http://blog.summation.net/2009/03/why-hiring-is-paradoxically-harder-in-a-downturn.html" title="Why Hiring is Paradoxically Harder in a Downturn">Why Hiring is Paradoxically Harder in a Downturn</a>. In the article, Auren makes the point that - with all the recent layoffs, the &#8220;signal-to-noise&#8221; ratio of Really Top Talent vs. Mediocre Talent has exploded. What that means for companies is that to acquire top talent, they will have to wade through many more resumes and have many more interviews (because, really, who can tell from a resume whether the candidate is truly exceptional?). Consequently, the risk of a bad hire has increased, perhaps 10-fold. 
</p>
<p>
What does that mean for you? If you&#8217;re one of those A-players he talks about, and you&#8217;re looking to change employers? Or you&#8217;ve been a top-notch contractor, but you&#8217;re looking for the right employer that will look to you for innovation and intrapreneurship? 
</p>
<p>
What it means is that you will have to work so much harder to stand out from the [Mediocre Talent] crowd. You will have to get very much smarter about developing your business contacts, investigating and researching companies&#8217; needs, and prospecting for potential opportunities. While you may have been able to secure interesting and rewarding work in the recent past, using resourceful, but basically traditional job-hunting techniques, you will need to <b>radically change your game</b>.
</p>
<p>
To get to the next level of the <b>Art of Getting Hired by the Right Company</b>, you&#8217;re going to need help. This, then, is the primary purpose of your jobhunting activities: <b>to get help</b>. From whom, you ask? From all the people you know, your business and personal contacts, and from the people they will refer you to. 
</p>
<blockquote>Mind you, when you meet people in the context of hunting for a job, <b>the one thing you don&#8217;t talk about is how you want them to give you a job</b>, or a job lead. You want their help, to be sure, but the help you&#8217;re looking for is information, feedback, suggestions on how to stand out, and - above all - introductions to hiring managers and influencers. Your purpose is to meet these people <i>before </i>there is a vacancy. Your goal is to identify their problem, and help them understand that you are the solution. If you do that well, you&#8217;re saving them, and yourself, a lot of time, effort and money.</blockquote>
<p>
In addition, now might be a good time to invest in a coach. Having a good coach can make the difference between searching for 6 months, or for 4. Just as elite athletes would not be at the peak of their game without the guidance of a coach, if you want to stand out in a positive way, it helps tremendously to have someone by your side to keep you focused and injury (screw-up) free. You can&#8217;t learn to run a marathon from a book, and you can&#8217;t train to <b>Win the Hiring Lotto</b> from behind a computer screen, either. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217; ...
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-21T17:43:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Recruiters: Useful? Or Not?</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/recruiters_useful_or_not/</link>
      <description>What about recruiters and employment agencies?

One of the most often recurring questions put to me by professional and/or management-level clients, is &quot;I was thinking to contact some employment agencies. Is that a good idea? How effective are they?&quot; While the question seems straightforward enough, the answer is more complicated than you would expect. 


The short answer is: For most well-educated, experienced mid- to senior level staff, and especially those seeking a career or industry change, recruitment agencies are often next to useless. Let me explain in some more detail:</description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recruiters or employment agencies can be effective <i>if</i> - and that&#8217;s a big if - they actually have been retained to recruit for a specific position. <i>And</i> if your résumé arrives at the precise time that this recruitment task has been accepted by the agency. <i>And</i> if your résumé makes it easy for the recruiter to fit you into a predictable pigeon hole. In other words, if you are a senior accounting professional, with an employment record of working in well-respected and well-known firms (easy to check your references and reputation) and are looking for a similar position as a senior accounting professional, in a similar industry ... you might get presented to the recruiter&#8217;s client (the company seeking a new staff member). 
<br />
 
<br />
In many cases, however, the recruitment agency works on spec - that is, they troll the internet and their network for job leads, and then they offer &#8220;shoo-in candidates&#8221; on speculation to the company. A shoo-in candidate can be defined as &#8220;Over-qualified, with experience in the same sector or industry and modest salary expectations&#8221;. Because the recruitment was not commissioned, the recruitment agency will offer the candidate &#8220;at a discount&#8221; - less than their normal placement fee. Sometimes companies bite, particularly if they&#8217;ve been looking for some time, but in most cases they respectfully decline. You may have noticed how some job postings contain a small-print line at the bottom of the ad that reads: &#8220;No solicitation, please&#8221; or &#8220;No third-party responses&#8221;. That&#8217;s directed at recruiters.
<br />
 
<br />
You may be a potential career changer, perhaps with a non-Canadian employment history; maybe you speak English with an accent (as do I, incidentally) or you may have ambitious salary expectations, or your previous job is no longer what you’re looking for … most agencies won&#8217;t touch you with a ten-foot pole as soon as they sense that you may not be so easily ‘pegged’. 
</p>
<p>
Oh, they&#8217;ll accept your résumé all right, and they may even talk with you, and tell you what a great candidate you are. They&#8217;ll keep you dangling, on the off-chance that an &#8220;easy fit&#8221; could come along. What they&#8217;ll tell you is that they are going to &#8220;aggressively market you to employers&#8221;, and that they are &#8220;already thinking of positions you would be perfect for&#8221; ... trust me: in many cases that&#8217;s marketing-speak; they&#8217;re just stringing you along. 
<br />
 
<br />
It&#8217;s important to remember just WHO their client (or potential client) is: an organization with a vacancy that is not easy to fill ... not you. To the agency, you are just a commodity. It&#8217;s also important to understand, that when there is an actual vacancy - even if it is one that you think you would be suited for - a company&#8217;s willingness to take risks becomes even less than usual. You&#8217;ve heard of the expression &#8220;must be able to hit the ground running?&#8221; What that means in practical terms, is that the company wants someone who has done it (whatever &#8220;it&#8221; is) successfully before, and will not screw up. The recruitment agency is going to most want to please their client - and will not promote a candidate who could fail, or who has not worked in that capacity or in that industry before.
<br />
 
<br />
So, while it may seem like an easy way to have other people do your job-hunting for you - you&#8217;re going to have to do it yourself, the hard way, by developing and leveraging your business contacts and uncovering the opportunities that don&#8217;t get advertised.
<br />
In a competitive market, it&#8217;s really the only way you&#8217;ll find out about senior positions before they become vacant, and because you&#8217;ll have established connections to executive teams and board members, you&#8217;ll be contacted when the position does come open.&nbsp;
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-18T21:01:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>22 Tips: How To Nail A Job Interview</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/22_tips_how_to_nail_a_job_interview/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Career Marketing, Career Strategies, Interview Strategies, Resume Development</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much &#8216;out there&#8217;, on the Internet - finding useful, relevant information is often worse than trying to find the proverbial needle in the haystack. This is one of the reasons <a href="www.twitter.com" title="Twitter ">Twitter </a>- and other social media apps, such as <a href="www.facebook.com" title="Facebook">Facebook</a>, <a href="www.LinkedIn.com" title="LinkedIn">LinkedIn</a>, and so on - work so well; instead of just one person (you) out there trolling the Web for cool information, advice, hints and tips, there are literally thousands of people finding great stuff all the time. And then they share it with their networks, who share it with theirs, and they in turn email links, or RT (Re-Tweet) the information, etcetera. Six degrees of separation - for information-sharing.
</p>
<p>
In the space of hours, one great find can be brought to the attention of hundreds of thousands of people. I try to pass on information whenever I think it has value, is interesting, or challenges conventional wisdom. To illustrate my point: 
</p>
<p>
On April 14, 2009, a 47-year old, decidedly frumpy-looking woman, from an obscure corner of the United Kingdom, auditioned in Week 5 of the ITV show &#8220;Britain&#8217;s Got Talent&#8221;. Today, April 16th, a Google Search on the name &#8220;Susan Boyle BGT&#8221; returns over 2800 unique entries. Hmmm, you might say, that&#8217;s not much.
</p>
<p>
However, the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lp0IWv8QZY" title="YouTube video of her audition">YouTube video of her audition</a> - singing &#8220;I Dreamed a Dream&#8221;, from the musical Les Miserables, has been viewed ... wait for it ... 14.8 MILLION times. And counting. Sometimes, a find is so spectacular, so unexpected (And Susan&#8217;s voice is absolutely stunning, astonishing, magnificent; as was the look on Simon Cowell&#8217;s face when she started singing), or so engaging, that it whizzes around the globe in no time flat.
</p>
<p>
Here&#8217;s a link to a post that I&#8217;m confident you&#8217;ll find interesting, and will appreciate the unvarnished and blunt truths: <a href="http://www.howtonailaninterview.com/" title="http://www.howtonailaninterview.com/">http://www.howtonailaninterview.com/</a>
<br />

</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-16T22:24:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Overqualified yesterday; underqualified today?</title>
      <link>http://www.hamer-associates.ca/ee/index.php/site/overqualified_yesterday_underqualified_today/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Career Strategies, Interview Strategies, Resume Development</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://www.jtanddale.com/?p=311#more-311" title="great post">great post</a>, brought to my attention via Twitter. H/T to @AndyInNaples, again!
</p>
<p>
<i>(Got to love Twitter - if you&#8217;re not on it yet, hurry and sign up. It&#8217;s rapidly replacing email and email marketing.)</i> 
</p>
<p>
Anyway, this article talks about one of the Great Frustrations of mid-level, middle-age, mid-career professionals: One day they&#8217;re told they&#8217;re really overqualified for the position they&#8217;ve applied for, and the next day, they may hear how actually, they&#8217;re underqualified. Damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t, it seems? 
</p>
<p>
As it turns out, <a href="http://www.jtanddale.com/" title="JT &amp; Dale">JT &amp; Dale</a>, are the online personas of <a href="http://www.dauten.com/index.html" title="Dale Dauten">Dale Dauten</a>, much-admired (by me) author of &#8220;The Gifted Boss&#8221; and many other great titles, and <a href="http://www.jtanddale.com/?page_id=10" title="J.T. O'Donnell">J.T. O&#8217;Donnell</a>, a career strategist (like me) who runs the site <a href="http://www.careerealism.com/" title="CareeRealism.com">CareeRealism.com</a>
</p>
<p>
Great read, and trust me, these two know what they&#8217;re talking about. Enjoy!
</p>
<blockquote><img src="http://www.hamer-associates.ca/images/giftedboss_cover.jpg"/> </blockquote> 
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-15T21:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
